I very much enjoyed the discussions about spatial metaphors, models and general ways of thinking about science communication. Some time ago I proposed my own “model” for science communication, seeing it as part of a “conceptual space”. This is a Read More …
2009 Bubela et al Science Communication Reconsidered This is the paper we were discussing as a potential model for a multi-authored workshop paper.
Inspired by our first-day debate here at Bellagio, as to how ‘honest’ today’s “Honest Brokers” (Pielke 2007, @RogerPielkeJr) in institutional communication really are, and preparing for our second-day discussion on the policy-dimenssion of pcst, I would like to point everyone Read More …
Here’s the article I referred to in a comment on the thread “Bringing research and practice together.” Salmon, Rhian A., Priestley, Rebecca K., & Goven, Joanna. (2017). The reflexive scientist: an approach to transforming public engagement. Journal of Environmental Studies Read More …
can be found here: https://sagepus.blogspot.co.il/2017/09/science-communication-20.html
Feinberg and Willer 2015_From Gulf to Bridge- When Do Moral Arguments Facilitate Political Influence?
Kahan._2010._Fixing_the_Communications_Failures
RedPOP, the science communication network for Latin America and the Caribbean, and collaborators, carried a study aiming to identify the papers on science communication published by academic journals written by authors in the region and/or about the region. After analyzing Read More …
[Warning: This is a long post. Sorry about that.] At least six times in the last two years, the U.S. National Academies of Science, Engineering, & Medicine (NASEM) has included science communication as a key component of its reports. That Read More …
The “post-truth” age of “alternative facts” suggests both the urgent need for effective science communication and also its failure over the past thirty years. Two sessions at the Science in Public conference explored what could be done. Responsible Research and Read More …